Earlier this week, I was blog surfing and crashed upon a post concerning the 80/20 rule of relationships. I wasn’t aware of this term. Supposedly, we all have a “checklist” in our head of the characteristics of an ideal mate. This post went on to say that we should be content with finding someone who possesses 80% of the criteria on our list. We are foolish to look for 100%. Apparently, many of us are caught up searching for that last 20% – finding that missing percentage in someone else and casting aside our current 80%-match mate for that other person. Ultimately, we are disappointed because this new person only fulfills 20% of our list. It becomes a never-ending cycle.
Do we all really have that permanent checklist? Yes, I’m sure I could arrive at a list today, but my list is going to be strongly influenced by my last relationship. Fresh in my mind, I can rattle off exactly what I want and don’t want in my next one, but are they really my core ideal-mate non-negotiable items?
Let’s say I come up with ten items. Of those, how can I decide which two are negotiable? If honesty is one of my ten (which it is) and I entangle with someone who has eight of the ten but isn’t honest, is the expectation that I am supposed to look the other way? How does one do that?
First, let me start with my list:
Ten Fifteen Things a Potential Mate Must Have (I couldn’t decide on just 10)
1. Attractive to me
2. Intelligent
3. Sense of Humor
4. Positive Outlook/Zest for Life
5. Passion for work or hobby
6. Financially stable – not to take care of me, but enough to take care of himself
7. Honest/Trustworthy
8. Liberal
9. Even Tempered
10. Similar Interests
11. Humble
12. Geographically Desirable
13. Chemistry
14. Mutual Respect
15. Love Me
Next, let me try to choose the three I could live happily without.
Pingback: Chemistry or Commitment? « Phorenications